Thu, Jul 24, 2025

It was late May 2024 when the air in lower Manhattan hung heavy with anticipation. In the middle of a high-stakes lunch run to Katz’s Deli, things shifted fast. Word spread — the jury had reached a verdict in Donald Trump’s criminal trial related to hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels. And then, like a tidal wave, the headlines broke.

Guilty. On all 34 counts.

For the first time in American history, a former president was now a convicted felon. As the BBC’s correspondent raced back, phone shattered in hand, the news was already echoing across the nation.

But what followed in the months ahead wasn’t quiet reflection — it was a bold counterattack. And this time, it was Trump who had the upper hand.

The Legal Storm That Never Ceased

After the trial, Trump faced a growing list of legal problems. But the tides shifted dramatically thanks to three major Supreme Court rulings — all seemingly designed to shield presidential power.

  1. Presidential Immunity Expanded

  2. Disqualification Ruling Tossed

  3. Lower Courts’ Power Curbed

Each of these decisions helped fortify Trump’s position, not just as a political contender, but as a former president whose reach now seemed almost untouchable. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court, reshaped during Trump’s term, had handed him a legal armor — and he wasted no time using it.

Jobs Report Matters

Federal Judges Under Fire

The administration’s new momentum brought with it a wave of tension aimed directly at the federal judiciary. Trump’s team didn’t hold back in their language — judges were called “crooked,” “lunatics,” and “radical left.” And those weren’t just throwaway insults. There were real consequences behind those words.

The Growing Threats

Retired and active judges alike began to speak out. John E. Jones III, a former federal judge, labeled the situation “unprecedented.” Nancy Gertner, who now teaches at Harvard Law School, confirmed that federal judges were facing serious threats — many even receiving death threats simply for doing their jobs.

The statistics are chilling: more than 400 threats against nearly 300 judges by mid-2024 — and that’s just what was officially tracked. From doxxing to impersonated pizza deliveries bearing the name of a judge’s deceased son, the message was clear: the pressure was on.

Even though Trump didn’t personally encourage violence, the environment being fostered was seen by many as dangerously hostile.

Executive Orders and Fast-Track Politics

From day one, Trump’s approach to governing has been aggressive. During his return to office, he signed over 140 executive orders in just the first half of the year. That’s more than Biden issued in four years.

Why the rush? Executive orders allow presidents to act quickly, bypassing the slower legislative process. And while they’re perfectly legal under the Constitution, they can spark major conflict when they clash with established laws — or the Constitution itself.

This has triggered dozens of legal battles. Courts across the country have issued injunctions to halt or pause the effects of certain orders until further review. The most recent Supreme Court decision now limits district judges’ ability to issue these nationwide injunctions, which dramatically reduces the checks on presidential power.

The Tension Between Democracy and Authority

Trump’s supporters argue that judges are standing in the way of the people’s will. Stephen Miller, a key figure in Trump’s administration, called the judiciary “out of control” and even accused judges of committing “the gravest assault on democracy.”

But legal experts say this narrative completely misses the point.

“We’re a nation of laws, not men,” Judge Jones reminded in an interview. The U.S. Constitution wasn’t built to simply reflect the desires of any single president — even one elected by a majority. It’s designed to keep every branch of government in balance.

Is the Balance of Power Being Rewritten?

For many critics, what’s happening now feels like a turning point. Some believe we’re watching a reshaping of how American democracy functions — one where the executive branch is steamrolling over the judiciary.

Professor Laurence Tribe, a renowned constitutional scholar, sees danger ahead. With Congress no longer acting as a meaningful check and courts being undermined, he worries the U.S. is heading for a “catastrophic situation.”

He’s not alone.

From the attempted delays in obeying court rulings — like the long wait in returning a wrongly deported man — to public officials openly ignoring judicial instructions, the sense that rules are being bent is growing.

Even within the administration, figures like Tom Homan have said outright, “We’re not stopping. I don’t care what the judges think.” That’s not just bold talk — it’s defiance.

Government Response

Judges Aren’t Backing Down

Despite the rising tensions and risks, judges haven’t stepped aside.

After the Supreme Court ruled that judges couldn’t issue sweeping nationwide injunctions as easily, some still pushed back. Just weeks later, a district judge blocked Trump’s controversial order on automatic citizenship — sending a strong message that the judiciary still had some fire left.

That resistance highlights something important: judges aren’t just passive players. They’re actively defending the integrity of their roles — and, by extension, the balance of American government.

What Comes Next?

Right now, the future is anything but certain.

The legal tug-of-war between Trump’s administration and the federal courts shows no signs of slowing down. And while Trump’s Supreme Court victories have tipped the scales in his favor, the lower courts are clearly not ready to fold.

This isn’t just about one president. The outcome of this power struggle could reshape how American government functions long after Trump leaves office. The next few years may very well decide whether the country leans more toward strongman rule — or if the founding principles of checks and balances can still hold their ground.

The battle is far from over. And what happens next might just define the future of American democracy.


Don’t trade all the time, trade forex only at the confirmed trade setups

Get more confirmed trade signals at premium or supreme – Click here to get more signals, 2200%, 800% growth in Real Live USD trading account of our users – click here to see , or If you want to get FREE Trial signals, You can Join FREE Signals Now!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Overall Rating

Also read